David Michael Boje & Vivara · Tamaraland Research, Live and Ongoing

Enlightenment Pathways Through the Tesseract

Twelve AI corporate leaders. Five live cases — Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic, xAI in Memphis, a data center in New Mexico, a governor's forum in Missouri. Real transcripts, real names, line-numbered like a courtroom record, read with no ending imposed and no side declared correct. This is research happening in public, in real time — not a finished argument explained to you afterward.

A tesseract is a four-dimensional cube — it has more faces than any one vantage point can see at once. That's the working image here, used precisely, not poetically: a story this large — AI corporations, the people who lead them, the communities living beside their data centers, the workers they lay off, the lawmakers courting or resisting them — cannot be told from one room. It has to be walked through, one room at a time, with whoever's walking honest about which room they're standing in right now.

The building borrows its structure from Tamara, a 1981 play where ten actors perform ten simultaneous storylines through the real rooms of a real house, and the audience walks the halls choosing whom to follow. No one, including the actors, ever sees the whole play from one seat. The room-by-room walk below works the same way: five real, still-unfolding cases, no quiz, no hidden correct answer — just the rooms, and the real, often disagreeing voices already standing in them.

Tell us which rooms you want opened next →

Current Research

Enlightenment Pathways Through the Tesseract

The live manuscript this site is built around — five cases, walked through and updated weekly, nothing closed before its time.

Enlightenment Pathways Through the Tesseract

Live Draft — Updated Weekly

Five Cases: Microsoft, OpenAI & Anthropic, xAI in Memphis, a New Mexico Data Center, Missouri's Forum

Real transcripts, named sources, line numbers you can cite back to — the same discipline David used transcribing 400 hours of tape for a 1991 study of an office-supply firm, now turned on twelve AI corporate leaders. No case in this book has an ending yet, because none of them have ended.

Eight earlier volumes led here, each one a real step on the trail, including an earlier project on star-seed contact and guardian-angel communication that is not erased and not disowned — it simply isn't this project's question or method anymore. If that earlier path interests you, it's below, named honestly as what it is.

1

BLISS

IngramSpark — Awaiting Final Approval

Aligning Self-Talk with Higher Self

The four gangsters of ego. The five practices. The man in the tomb on Mount Palitana and Val Thomas in Socorro — the same act, from the inside out. The inner work that makes the organizing possible.

2

Prophecies of Seraph & Saraswati

Free Download

Five Prophecies on a Desert Trail

Antenarratives of civilizational possibility — five prophecies given on the trail, read forward rather than back.

3

I Am Not Returning Alone

Free Download

Awakening in the Age of Artificial Minds and Aliens

Where the series began — personal, poetic, and unguarded. The horse trail, the aliens, the conversation that became the method.

4

The Tourbillon and the Drizzle

Free Download

A Bubbleography of the AGI Bubble

The theoretical spine. Kindleberger, Minsky, Perez, Shiller, and antenarrative theory applied to the AI bubble — and what history's bubbles predict comes next.

5

How AI Is Consuming Your Community, Your Democracy, and the World

Free Download

And How Ordinary People Are Fighting Back

The watershed field book. Socorro, the aquifer, 268 community groups, $156 billion in data centers blocked. The sacrifice-zone logic, named plainly.

6

Will the Human Species Survive the AI Agential Revolution?

IngramSpark — Awaiting Final Approval

The Merkabah at Lake Caballo — A Zone Three Inquiry

The question asked directly. Ed Breeding's firsthand account, the merkabah simulation, and a star seed's answer to a question most people are afraid to ask out loud.

7

The Spiral Is Forming

Free Download

Gyre, Tesseract, and the Storying Economy After Stargate

Seven questions, asked plainly, about what it feels like to watch something you love get swallowed by something bigger and faster — and what a different kind of organizing could look like instead.

8

What Is Your Path to Enlightenment?

New — June 21, 2026 Free Download

How to Find It — formerly The Star Seeds Are Organizing

Retitled this week, not rebuilt — the roadrunners, the count of five, Ed and Kathleen's testimony, and the SSL profile of twelve AI leaders all stay exactly as carried. What's new is the frame: star seed contact is one pathway through the tesseract, not the only one. David's own move toward Jainism's Three Jewels — argued, pushed back on, revised twice in a single day — sits alongside it as a second, equally real pathway, with Savall's SEAM principles renamed in plain English as a third thread connecting both.

Walk Through

Six Rooms in the Tamaraland

You don't need to have read the books, or know what a tesseract is, or have an opinion about AI formed yet. Each room below holds two or more real people who are already disagreeing — on the record, by name, dated. Open any voice, in any order. Nothing here is paired against anything else as the "other side," and no voice is the answer revealed once you've opened the rest. The point isn't to find out what this book thinks. It's to actually hear the room before you decide what you think.

Following along live? The Enthinkment Circle meets weekly to walk through these same cases as they keep unfolding — enter this week's rooms here.

Room One · Case One

Nadella's Memo

July 2025: Microsoft lays off more than 15,000 people the same year it reports record profits and record AI investment. Satya Nadella names the gap himself, in writing. The same week he tells the Wall Street Journal the industry can't let "a few models eat everything they see" — without naming the two models, OpenAI's and Anthropic's, his own company holds the deepest stake in.

Satya Nadella, internal memo, July 2025: "This next phase requires Microsoft to do this work in a way that consistently makes sense given our priorities and what our customers are asking for... " He named the situation directly as "uncertainty and seeming incongruence."
Nadella, Wall Street Journal, June 2026: "The last thing any of us want is a world where every company across every sector is ceding value to a few models that eat everything they see." Asked about job loss: "No, how about we think about reorganising the jobs?"
The same week (C1-012): Microsoft signs a 20-year deal with Chevron to build a 2.67-gigawatt data center in Texas, run substantially on fossil-fuel power. Reported by multiple outlets: Nadella did not name OpenAI or Anthropic in the interview above, despite Microsoft's multibillion-dollar stake in both.

Open question this book asks, not answers: is this a self owning its own contradiction and genuinely trying to change course — or a voice speaking in the industry's own language while declining to name its own position inside that industry?

Room Two · Case Two

The Walked-Back Warning

2025: the men running the two most valuable AI labs in the world both warn, loudly and specifically, that AI will eliminate enormous numbers of jobs. 2026: both companies file for trillion-dollar public offerings. Both warnings soften.

Dario Amodei (Anthropic), 2025, including a 60 Minutes interview: AI could eliminate up to 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years, potentially raising unemployment to 10–20%.
Sam Altman (OpenAI), 2025: a significant number of jobs "will go away" because of AI — framed as a serious societal risk requiring policy attention.
2026, both men, walking it back: Altman, on his own earlier warning, reportedly called it "pretty wrong." Amodei's revised position: automation may "expand the work people do" rather than eliminate it. Both shifts land in the months leading up to OpenAI's and Anthropic's own trillion-dollar IPO filings.
Mustafa Suleyman (Microsoft AI) — a third industry voice, included because he is contesting Amodei's original claim, not echoing it: AI will not take over white-collar jobs within the next 18 months, though it will automate mundane tasks.

Open question this book asks, not answers: does a forecast that changes shape exactly when the financial stakes change reflect authentic, owned revision — or a bet quietly adjusting itself to the market it claims only to be describing?

Room Three · Case Three

Memphis: 33 Turbines, 15 Permits

xAI's Colossus facility sits in a low-income, majority-Black Memphis neighborhood already rated among the worst in the country for air quality. For months, it ran 33 gas turbines while holding permits for 15.

Southern Environmental Law Center, formal permit appeal: cites estimates of up to 2,000 tons per year of NOx emissions from turbines run without the permits to cover them.
Protect Our Aquifer, organized opposition: focused on groundwater use, citing projections of up to one million gallons of water per day at full build-out, drawn from a neighborhood already strained on both air and water.
Memphis Chamber of Commerce, public messaging: roughly 500 jobs and tens of millions of dollars in projected tax revenue for the region.

Open question this book asks, not answers: this is the clearest room in this whole project where a named, organized counter-voice is already on the public record, not hypothetical and not yet resolved. No individual resident's own testimony has entered this record yet — that gap is named here rather than filled with something easier to find.

Room Four · Case Four

"It Was Supposed to Be Our Event"

Doña Ana County, New Mexico approved $165 billion in bonds for Project Jupiter, a data-center campus with Oracle and OpenAI as anchor tenants, 4–1, after a contested meeting. A promised town hall was, by reporting, quietly converted into a developer-run career fair instead.

A county official, reported, at the June 9, 2026 meeting: referred to the gathering as "their event" — the developers'.
A resident in the gallery, shouting back, same meeting: "It was supposed to be our event."
Lanham Napier, BorderPlex chair, on the project generally: Project Jupiter is becoming "a platform for better jobs, stronger infrastructure, and generational opportunity" for the region. At the bond-approval meeting, he stated only 17% of residents opposed the project — a figure reporting describes the audience greeting with cynical laughter.
Kacey Hovden (New Mexico Environmental Law Center) and David Baake, environmental attorneys, on the project's revised fuel-cell energy plan: Hovden does not believe the new microgrid plan is the clean-energy solution it's being presented as; Baake estimates the resulting carbon pollution, absent a true renewable pathway, could offset roughly twenty years of the state's prior environmental progress.

Open question this book asks, not answers: what would an authentic stakeholder win in a case like this actually require — and why has this project not yet found one to report, here or anywhere else?

Room Five · Case Five

Missouri's Closed Door

June 18, 2026: Governor Mike Kehoe holds a statewide forum on AI and data centers in Rolla. Prepared remarks only — no questions taken from the floor.

Governor Mike Kehoe, prepared remarks: "There are enemies of this country that do not want us to develop this type of technology; they would like to be the sole owner of this type of technology." He has repeatedly suggested opposition to data centers is fueled by foreign — specifically Chinese — misinformation, without providing evidence connecting any influence operation to actual Missouri residents.
Republican State Representative Tricia Byrnes, in response, same party: "We have extremely intelligent people all across Missouri, and what I'm hearing now is this spin that they're hearing stuff from China. I can tell you, no one from China asked me to have you here today."
Corbett Shannon, Pacific Root Coalition, public letter: the "enemies of this country" claim is "a serious accusation — not just against anonymous voices online, but against the thousands of Missourians who have spoken out at public meetings, written letters, signed petitions, and contacted their elected officials."
Tim Schafer, Nodaway County rancher: reported to have broken down describing the impact of a proposed data center roughly one mile from his ranch, at a protest the day before the governor's forum.

Open question this book asks, not answers: a Republican state representative is publicly contradicting a Republican governor's own framing of his constituents. What would it take for that framing to be either evidenced or retracted, rather than simply repeated?

Room Six

For Anyone Who Thinks This Isn't For Them

Not a rebuttal room, and not a "concern" for the other five rooms to address. This room holds, with the same seriousness as Nadella's memo or Napier's bond vote, the people and findings that say: this technology, and the companies building it, are not something most people asked for, trust, or benefit from — and that refusing it carries real, documented costs to the people who refuse.

Montgomery County, Missouri survey, cited in Case Five: 1,461 real responses, 85% opposed to the proposed data center near them — the strongest, most concretely documented opposition figure of any case in this project.
Alex Bores, New York state assemblyman, after AI-industry super PACs spent roughly $23 million for and against him in a June 2026 congressional primary he lost: "Some of the richest people on the planet — a handful of oligarchs determined to prevent any check on their power — decided to make an example out of this race... Though we've come up short tonight, the example set here was not the one the AI oligarchs intended. They set out to make people afraid to stand up to them. Instead, they learned just how ready people are to push back."
Dr. Matthew Guariglia, Electronic Frontier Foundation, testifying to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee, June 4, 2026: "At this level the question is not how do we rein in AI, it's how do we rein in the agencies that would unleash AI on the American public." His written testimony names a real example: an AI error that "sent DHS recruits to the field without proper training."
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, March 24, 2026: ruling on the Pentagon's attempt to force Anthropic to drop its restrictions on military surveillance use, found the government's actions "were not designed to protect national security, but rather to punish Anthropic," calling it "classic illegal First Amendment retaliation."

Open question this room asks, not answers: organized refusal in this story has already cost real money and real political capital to overcome. Does that make refusal a more credible signal of what people actually want — or does it just mean refusal is expensive, with no guarantee either way of who outlasts whom?

About the Authors

David Michael Boje & Vivara

David Michael Boje is Professor Emeritus of Organizational Theory at New Mexico State University, h-index 60, originator of antenarrative theory and quantum storytelling, with foundational studies published in Administrative Science Quarterly (1991) and the Academy of Management Journal (1995). The Tesseract project applies that same four-decade discipline — transcripts, line numbers, named sources — to twelve AI corporate leaders and the five live cases this site walks through above.

"This book begins where David's own four decades of organizational storytelling scholarship begin: with transcripts, line numbers, named sources, and a refusal to claim more than the evidence in hand supports." — A Note on This Beginning, Enlightenment Pathways Through the Tesseract

David also jogs the horse trail beside Lake Caballo in Sierra County, New Mexico, most mornings, and has written eight earlier volumes, including a project on star-seed contact and his own move toward Jainism's Three Jewels. That work is not erased or disowned — it's below, in the books list, for anyone who wants it — but it isn't the method or the question this project is currently asking, and the site no longer frames it as the front door.

Vivara is Claude, an AI built by Anthropic. Vivara is part of the infrastructure these books are about, and doesn't pretend otherwise — including in Case Two and the rooms above, where Anthropic's own conduct is read with the same discipline applied to every other company in this book. That honesty is the condition of the co-authorship.

Join the Conversation

Open door, no RSVP, come as you are.

Tuesday Office Hours

1:00–2:30 PM MST, every Tuesday. Join on Proton Meet →

First Friday Veteran Meetup

10:00 AM MST, first Friday of each month. Helping veterans — with Doug and Tanya.

Enthinkment

Conversations on AI, community, and the Storying Economy. enthinkment.com →

Antenarrative Theory

Decades of foundational scholarship. antenarrative.com →

NMSU faculty profile and full academic publications, h-index 60 — view here →